Application of a wearable visual field meter based on extended reality glasses in macular disease

Authors: Yuan Jing, Wang Xingchang, Sun Xiquan, Jiao Huiguang, Wang Qian, Tong Yanxia, Tu Biyue, Yan Xixi, Zhao Zhen, Ou Xiaojie, Abdulla Sawut
   

Citation  

Yuan Jing, Wang Xingchang, Sun Xiquan,  et al. Application of a wearable visual field meter based on extended reality glasses in macular disease[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol, 2025, 43(11):1035-1040. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20250610-00196.

ABSTRACT                   [Download PDF]  [Read Full Text]

Objective  To evaluate the application effect of a wearable visual field meter based on extended reality (XR) glasses for patients with macular disease.

Methods  A self-controlled study was conducted.A total of 41 consecutive patients (41 eyes) with macular disease were recruited at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from October 2022 to October 2024.All patients underwent 10-2 center visual field test using a self-developed wearable visual field meter (XRVF), and the results were compared with those obtained using a traditional Humphrey field analyzer (HFA).The comparison parameters included mean retinal sensitivity (MS), false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR), and testing duration.A subject satisfaction questionnaire was administered.This study followed the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (No.WDRY2024-K263), and all subjects signed the informed consent form.

Results  The retinal sensitivity of patients measured by HFA was (23.24±3.71)dB, which was higher than (22.01±3.45)dB by XRVF, showing a statistically significant difference ( t=4.924, P=0.036).The FPR measured by HFA and XRVF were (2.39±2.51)% and (2.59±3.29)%, respectively, and the FNR were (3.49±6.05)% and (3.74±5.38)%, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference ( t=-3.624, P=0.948; t=-1.241, P=0.519).The median test duration for HFA and XRVF was 6.15 (5.78, 6.65) and 5.98 (5.71, 6.69)minutes, respectively, without statistically significant difference ( Z=-1.987, P=0.953).92.6% of the subjects thought the device was comfortable, simple and practical.

Conclusions  The XRVF has good consistency with the HFA, can effectively and reliably evaluate the visual field function of patients with macular disease, and is easily accepted by patients.

KEYWORDS:

Macular disease; Visual field; Extended reality; Humphrey visual field meter; Mean light sensitivity

Authors Info & Affiliations 

Yuan Jing
Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
Wang Xingchang
Shenzhen Vision Stick Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518055, China
Sun Xiquan
Shenzhen Vision Stick Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518055, China
Jiao Huiguang
Shenzhen Vision Stick Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518055, China
Wang Qian
Shenzhen Vision Stick Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518055, China
Tong Yanxia
Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
Tu Biyue
Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
Yan Xixi
Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
Zhao Zhen
Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
Ou Xiaojie
Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
Abdulla Sawut
Eye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
(Read 3 times, 3 visits today)