Comparison of pharmacodynamics between different batches of recombinant decoy receptor innovative drug RC28-E1 and RC28-E2 in retinal angiogenesis and neovascularization and its mechanism

Authors: Gu Zhongxiu,  Jiang Jing,  Huang Min,  Wu Mianmian,  Guo Fang,  Li Shenjun,  Fang Jianmin,  Zhao Shaozhen,  Zhang Yan

DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.08.002
Published 2018-08-10
Cite as Chin J Exp Ophthalmol, 2018,36(8): 581-589.

Abstract                               [Download PDF] [Read Full Text]

Objective

To compare the pharmacodynamics between different batches of recombinant decoy receptor innovative drug RC28-E1 and RC28-E2 in retinal angiogenesis and neovascularization, and analyze its mechanism.

Methods

Sixty postnatal Day 4 (P4) C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into normal control group, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)+ fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) group, VEGF+ FGF2+ RC28-E1 group, VEGF+ FGF2+ RC28-E2 group, VEGF+ FGF2+ conbercept group and VEGF+ FGF2+ FGF trap group by using a random number table, with 10 mice in each group.The mouse retinal explant culture system was established, and stimulated with the corresponding factors and drugs prepared in the starving culture media.The normal controls were treated with the starving media.Then the retinal explants were stained with Isolectin B4 and imaged.The number of filopodia per vascular length was quantified.In addition, ninety-six P7 C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into normal control group, oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) model control group, OIR+ RC28-E1 group, OIR+ RC28-E2 group, OIR+ conbercept group and OIR+ FGF trap group by using a random number table, with 16 mice in each group.The normal controls were raised under normoxia for 10 days, and the rest of the groups were raised under hyperoxia for 5 days, then returned to normoxia for another 5 days.On P17, the retinas were isolated and stained with Isolectin B4.The stained retinas were mounted on the slides and photographed.The relative vessel obliteration and neovascularization in retina were analyzed with computer software.Then the protein levels of VEGF and FGF2 were examined by Western blot in the retinas of each group in the OIR experiment.Finally, in the RF/6A cells stimulated with VEGF and FGF2, the activities of the signaling pathways, including MEK-extracellular regulated protein kinases (Erk), protein kinase C (PKC) and protein kinase B (Akt) pathways, were examined by Western blot.All experimental procedures were evaluated and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tianjin Medical University (SYXK 2009-0001), and were in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.

Results

The results of retinal explant cultures showed that the numbers of filopodia per vascular length in VEGF+ FGF2+ RC28-E1, VEGF+ FGF2+ RC28-E2, VEGF+ FGF2+ conbercept, and VEGF+ FGF2+ FGF trap groups were all significantly less than that in the VEGF+ FGF2 group (all at P < 0.001). The filopodia number in retinal vascular front in RC28-E1 group was similar to that in the RC28-E2 group (P=0.15), whereas the filopodia numbers in both groups were significantly decreased as compared to those in VEGF+ FGF2+ conbercept group and VEGF+ FGF2+ FGF trap group (all at P<0.001). The results from the OIR mouse model showed that the relative vessel obliteration area in OIR model control group was dramatically higher than those in the drug intervention groups (all at P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the relative vessel obliteration area between OIR+ RC28-E1 group and OIR+ RC28-E2 group (P=0.17), while the obliteration areas in both RC28-E-intervened groups were significantly lower than those in the OIR+ conbercept group and OIR+ FGF trap group (all at P<0.05). The relative neovascular pixels in the intervention groups were significantly lower than those in the OIR model control group (all at P<0.001). The neovascular pixels in OIR+ RC28-E1 group were significantly lower than those in VEGF+ FGF2+ conbercept group and VEGF+ FGF2+ FGF trap group (both at P<0.05), but comparable to those in OIR+ RC28-E2 group (P =0.39). Western blot result showed that, the protein expression of VEGF and FGF2 in the OIR mouse retinas were significantly upregulated compared to those in the normal ones (both at P<0.001). The upregulation of both genes were normalized by both RC28-E1 and RC28-E2.In addition, the stimulation of VEGF and FGF2 induced an enhanced activity in MEK-Erk pathway in RF/6A cells, whereas RC28-E1 inhibited the overactivation.

Conclusions

RC28-E1 and RC28-E2 both can inhibit angiogenesis in the retinal explants isolated from neonatal mice; they also reduce vessel obliteration and mitigate neovascularization in the OIR mouse model.Therefore, the pharmacology batch and pilot test batch of RC28-E have similar efficacies and reliable stability, and are superior in the anti-angiogenic and anti-neovascular efficacy to the currently clinically available drugs conbercept and FGF trap.RC28-E1 may suppress pathological neovascularization through inhibiting the overactivation of MEK-Erk pathway in retinal vascular endothelial cells.

Key words:

Retinal neovascularization; Decoy receptor; Basic fibroblast growth factor; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Recombinant protein drugs

Contributor Information

Gu Zhongxiu
Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Eye Institute, College of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300384, China
Jiang Jing
School of Pharmacy, Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou 264003, China
Huang Min
Remegen, Ltd., Yantai 264006, China
Wu Mianmian
Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Eye Institute, College of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300384, China
Guo Fang
Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Eye Institute, College of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300384, China
Li Shenjun
Remegen, Ltd., Yantai 264006, China
Fang Jianmin
School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Zhao Shaozhen
Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Eye Institute, College of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300384, China
Zhang Yan
Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Eye Institute, College of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300384, China
(Read 68 times, 1 visits today)
Updated: February 10, 2023 — 3:49 am